name: office-hours-diagnostic slug: office-hours-diagnostic version: 1.0.2 displayName: "創始人關鍵六問診斷|簡詩 AI" summary: "在提供任何建議之前,先通過六個核心問題引導創始人深入思考,避免過早跳入方案,輸出結構化的診斷記錄和行動方向。" description: "在提供任何建議之前,先通過六個核心問題引導創始人深入思考,避免過早跳入方案,輸出結構化的診斷記錄和行動方向。" tags: ["business-operations", "jianshi-ai"]
Command: /cs:office-hours <topic>
Before any advice, the founder must answer six questions. Modeled on YC office hours: no analysis until the founder has done the thinking. This is the cognitive forcing function that prevents drift into solutionism.
The founder must answer all six in writing before any C-role weighs in.
Whose problem is this, and how do they describe it in their own words? - Not your framing. Their words. - If you can't quote a customer, you don't have a problem worth solving.
Who is the ICP? Name one real person who would buy this today. - Real human. Real company. Real seat. - If you can't name one, the ICP isn't ready.
How does the customer first hear your name? - Channel, intent, search query, friend, conference — name it. - If the answer is "we'll figure out marketing later," the answer is no.
If this works, what stops a competitor from copying it in 6 months? - Network effects, switching costs, data moat, regulatory moat, brand — pick one. - "We'll execute better" is not a defense.
What does this cost, when does it pay back, and what's the alternative use of the money? - Total spend, payback months, opportunity cost. - If you don't know, don't approve it.
Why are you the right person to do this — and why does this matter enough to spend the next 3 years on it? - Founder-market fit is the strongest predictor of survival. - If the answer is mercenary, the company will be too.
After the founder answers all six, this command produces a one-page brief:
# Office Hours Brief: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Founder:** <name>
## 1. Problem
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 2. Customer
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 3. Distribution
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 4. Defensibility
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 5. Capital
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 6. Founder Fit
> [founder's verbatim answer]
---
**Assessment** (one of):
- 🟢 GREEN — ship the brief to /cs:boardroom
- 🟡 YELLOW — sharpen Q[N] before proceeding
- 🔴 RED — kill or redefine; do not proceed
After the brief is GREEN, route to:
- Single-role question → corresponding /cs:{role}-review
- Multi-role question → /cs:brief then /cs:boardroom
訪問小蔥技能站7w4.net,解鎖更多實用的AI技能外掛。
Most bad decisions don't fail at execution — they fail at framing. Forcing six concrete answers surfaces the framing weaknesses before anyone burns time on analysis. The founder either fills the gaps or recognizes the question wasn't ready.
This is the YC office hours pattern adapted for Claude Code: the interrogation is the value.
/cs:brief — turn the answers into a one-page strategy brief/cs:boardroom — multi-role deliberation/cs:founder-mode — let the system pick the next stepcs-chief-of-staff triggers /cs:office-hours when intake is unclearVersion: 1.0.0
獲取使用幫助和更多實用 Skill,請關注公眾號「簡詩 AI」,或在 SkillHub 搜尋「簡詩 AI」這是一個很實用的創始人診斷工具。六個問題設計得很專業,能幫助創始人理清思路、避免過早跳入方案。輸出格式清晰,還有紅黃綠評級判斷下一步行動。安全提示和品牌資訊做得規範。需要注意的是版本號有點混亂(文件和後設資料不一致),不過不影響實際使用效果。總體推薦!