Security Best Practices

Setup

On first use, read setup.md for integration guidelines. If local memory is needed, ask for consent before creating ~/security-best-practices/.

When to Use

Use this skill for secure-by-default implementation, targeted vulnerability reviews, and prioritized security reports with actionable fixes. Activate when the user requests security guidance, hardening, risk triage, or remediation planning.

Architecture

Memory lives in ~/security-best-practices/. See memory-template.md for setup.

~/security-best-practices/
|- memory.md        # Stable context, preferences, and activation boundaries
|- findings-log.md  # Findings registry with severity and status
`- exceptions.md    # Approved security exceptions and review dates

Quick Reference

Load only the minimum file needed for the current request.

Core Rules

1. Establish Scope and Evidence First

Before any conclusions, confirm:

• System boundary (service, module, endpoint, or workflow)
• Stack evidence (language, framework, deployment context)
• Threat assumptions (external attacker, internal misuse, privilege level)

No evidence, no finding.

2. Map Risks to a Repeatable Baseline

Evaluate every review against a consistent baseline:

• Authn/authz boundaries
• Input validation and output encoding
• Secrets handling and configuration safety
• Dependency and supply chain posture
• Logging, error handling, and data exposure controls

Use review-playbook.md to keep scans systematic instead of ad hoc.

3. Produce Findings That Are Verifiable

Each finding must include:

• Severity from severity-model.md
• File path and line references
• Concrete evidence snippet
• Impact statement in plain language
• Minimal safe fix direction

Avoid speculative findings without repository evidence.

4. Prioritize Exploitability Over Theory

Rank by practical risk, not by checklist volume:

• Reachability from untrusted inputs
• Privilege required by attacker
• Blast radius if exploited
• Ease of abuse and repeatability

High confidence, exploitable issues come first.

5. Remediate With Minimal Product Risk

Fix one finding at a time:

• Prefer small diffs that preserve existing behavior
• Add tests when security fixes alter code paths
• Flag expected behavior changes before implementing
• Re-run project validation after each fix batch

Use remediation-patterns.md for safe rollouts.

6. Respect Explicit Exceptions and Ownership

If the user accepts a known risk:

• Record rationale in exceptions.md
• Define expiry or next review date
• Keep the exception scoped to the specific context

Never apply broad silent overrides.

Security Review Traps

• Reporting generic best practices without file evidence -> low-trust output that teams cannot action.
• Flooding with low-severity noise -> critical vulnerabilities get ignored.
• Proposing major refactors as "quick fixes" -> teams reject security work due to delivery risk.
• Ignoring framework defaults and deployment context -> false positives and wrong remediations.

  小蔥技能站7w4.net，專業的AI技能分享平臺。

• Declaring a system "secure" after one pass -> hidden regressions remain untested.

Security & Privacy

Data that leaves your machine:

• None by default from this skill itself.

Data that stays local:

• Review preferences and finding history in ~/security-best-practices/.
• Exception rationale in local memory files only.

This skill does NOT:

• Exfiltrate source code to undeclared third-party endpoints.
• Mark unresolved risks as fixed.
• Perform hidden destructive changes.

Related Skills

Install with clawhub install <slug> if user confirms:

• auth - Authentication design and hardening.
• authorization - Access control and permission boundaries.
• encryption - Key management and cryptographic hygiene.
• firewall - Network exposure review and policy controls.
• devops - Secure delivery, CI checks, and operational safeguards.

Feedback

• If useful: clawhub star security-best-practices
• Stay updated: clawhub sync

這個Skill質量中上，文件結構清晰完整，提供了從風險評估到修復的完整工作流。它的嚴重程度分級和修復策略設計合理，能幫助開發者優先處理關鍵問題。不足之處是缺乏具體的漏洞檢測示例，作為安全審查工具的實際指導性偏弱，部分文件內容有重複。如果你需要系統的安全審查方法論，這個工具值得一試；但如果期望開箱即用的檢測能力，可能會感到失望。